Archive for April, 2010

30
Apr

The wettening

There are certain ways in which it is pleasant to wake up.

Breakfast in bed is nice.

Slowly surfacing from slumber snuggled in soft sheets is splendid.

Even just…waking up after a night of restful sleep to the smell of fresh coffee.  Totally acceptable.

A less acceptable way to wake up is struggling out of dreams to the sound of your name called from another room in a tone that sounds somewhat urgent, stumbling blearily out of bed and stepping out of the bedroom doorway onto  a confusingly cold and squelchy carpet.  And then forward onto the linoleum floor, which your brain is beginning to process is covered in an inch or so of rather chilly water.

Apparently, at some point last night, Robin aided a framed painting I had hanging behind the toilet to…no longer be so much hanging as plummeting.  Unfortunately, the exciting journey which said painting was enjoying was curtailed by it’s disastrous collision with the PVC pipe which fed water into the toilet.  What followed was…well…squelchiness.

It could have been worse — first of all, that cold and soggy floor COULD have been soaked in something less benign than clean water.  It could have been the congealing blood of a congressman unaccountably murdered in our living room in the middle of the night…slightly more realistically, it could have been fluid that had already passed through the toilet rather than just entering the tank.  And aside from a few galley books, I think we mostly suffer from from some very wet carpet and rather wet clothing.  Heck, I needed to clean out the closet and spare room anyway.  Burgandy is bringing over her shop vac and Anna is going to loan us her dehumidifier, so we’ll have two going to suck moisture out of the damp house.  And because this was his early day, Briggs was up at least an hour sooner than he would have been any other day, so that’s an hour of flooding curtailed.  All in all, only about a third of the house is really wet, and most of that third was storage and such…it would have been nice if the part that flooded was the tile and linoleum portion with the drain, but fate was still kinder than it could have been.

However, the situation is undeniably inconvenient.  First of all…did I mention that is NOT the way to wake up?  And I know Briggs had it worse than I, as he had to wake up and not only encounter a horribly flooded house, but also deal with figuring out where the flood was coming from and how to make it stop.  He had to call out of work, and I don’t know just how much homework I’m going to get done today, but it probably won’t be as much as I had initially planned.  Our water is currently off, which is always so much more troublesome than one expects, and of course, the toilet is out of commission at the moment.  Also, we have piles of mostly dry and slightly damp and a bit soggy stuff out on our porch, which will all need to be dealt with.  We also have a good sized bag of various clothes and such that were on the floor of the closet that are more than a little damp, and will need to be sorted and washed.

All in all, this is not exactly how either of us wanted to spend our day.

And now the shop-vac has arrived and we can begin extracting moisture.  Wish us luck.

28
Apr

Awesome Website of the Day

Google Doodles — all the Google doodles from all the countries.  AWESOME.

AAAAANNNDDD now, thanks to this video, I know what my dream job is.


Watch CBS News Videos Online

26
Apr

This week’s rantlet – where does free speech end?

I suppose more than a rant, this is perhaps just a question.

A friend of mine on Facebook (heck, in RL too, I suppose) joined the facebook group “petition to remove facebook group praying for President Obama’s death”.  I commented that, while I thought that their cause was jerkish and inappropriate, I believe in free speech and felt that their choice to have that facebook group fell into the free speech category. She responded by saying that she agreed with free speech as well, and if the group said they didn’t like his policy or his shoes, that would be fine, but that praying for his death was horrible, and furthermore, some nut-job could very well take their hopes to heart and act upon them.

So, where does free speech end?  I mean, isn’t limiting free speech ‘for people’s own good’ one of the hot button issues in the post-9/11 world regarding such things as the Patriot Act?  I haven’t done any research for this post and am just writing off the cuff, but I think I recall that the PA includes such policies as the ability to take people into custody with no real proof and hold indefinitely if they, for example, say that they disagree with the way the government is running things…because saying the government is wrong is unpatriotic and could be a sign that someone’s a terrorist.  The PA is considered by many to be largely unconstitutional and spit in the face of free speech, freedom of assembly and a bunch of other freedoms…and the PA is justified using similar arguments to the one my friend made, arguments saying that we have freedom of speech, as long as we stick to the approved topics.

I’m not good with all the political intricacies and hope I get my point here across without sounding like an average American high school student (zing! haha.), but basically, free speech means that people can say what they want to about what they want, even if what they say is unpopular or mean.  And taking that freedom away is oppressive.

At least that’s my understanding of the situation.

Now first of all, I don’t agree with a praying that the president dies — he may not be the best leader the country has ever had, but he’s okay and at least trying to make some headway on issues I care about, and furthermore, I don’t think it’s nice to pray for ANYONE’S death.  It’s a jerk move.

Second, I understand that Facebook is a privately-owned company/business/whatever, and they have the right to refuse service, so the matter is moot in this particular case.

However, it’s about the principle of the thing, about how we think.  If someone wants to say that they think a certain belief is stupid, or that they hate a certain group of people, or that…I don’t know, that Thomas Kinkade is a great artist, I may consider their views bigoted, or small-minded or stupid, but they have the right to say those things, just as I have the right to tell them that I think they are wrong…but I don’t have the right to persecute them for what they say or think.  I think I remember learning in third-grade history that one of the ideas that was supposed to have been behind the founding of this country was that everyone is entitled to think what they want (at least if they were white men;)) and the government couldn’t punish them for having different beliefs than other people.

So, where are the limits?  Should we be able to say and believe anything we want?   I don’t think anyone should read out loud from a long-lost book of demonic writes written in Latin, or speak the words that summon Cthulhu…is that an imposition of my own bigotry? If someone believes that they are Napoleon, it is generally taken badly.  It used to be that a non-white could get in big trouble for professing feelings for someone who was white, and everyone got thrashed for romance with someone of the same gender.  We are slowly getting over our issues with race and orientation, so I know that doesn’t seem to fall into the same category of nasty as praying for someone to die, but not that long ago, they would have been considered worse.

So, where is the line?  Obviously, even I have one or two.  But if there are things that are wrong to say, who gets to decide that?

26
Apr

Awesome website of the day

Simple English Wikipedia

Sometimes, I go wiki something and the explanation of the term, subject, theory or whathaveyou is so technical that I feel like my question is even less explained than it was than when I started.  SE Wikipedia touts itself as a site for children, or people who are learning English.  Which makes it feel like a bit of a cop-out to forgo the detailed equations and physics terminology, but when I actually want to understand something and the people posting on Wikipedia Classic find it necessary to prove that they do, indeed, have degrees in whatever and I don’t, it’s nice to know there’s another option.





Paypal Payment

calenders and prints



Now Reading

Planned books:

None

Current books:

  • A Feast for Crows (A Song of Ice and Fire, Book 4)

    A Feast for Crows (A Song of Ice and Fire, Book 4) by George R.R. Martin

  • Crossroads of Twilight (The Wheel of Time, Book 10)

    Crossroads of Twilight (The Wheel of Time, Book 10) by Robert Jordan

Recent books:

View full Library